He just wanted a financial settlement and surely didn't see any possibility of the source code being of any financial worth again, so I imagine Nintendo gained clear title towards it in the settlement just like those other instances.Īnd there's nothing stopping them from programming a recreation of it like they did in Donkey Kong 64 even if they lack the source code (The lawsuit had nothing to do with game concept or trademark ownership, it was all about the source code itself). So there's no reason to think he still has any claims to the arcade source code here. ![]() He also went after some other high profile releases he was involved in and that have since been rereleased by other companies. I'm guessing there may be a similar story for some of the other early arcade games.A 20+ year old lawsuit that was settled out of court about the ownership of the source code. Donkey Kong I believe there's some legal reasoning why the arcade version doesn't come around, owing to its development.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |